Wargaming & Scenario Simulation
WINS games on your actual decision nodes. Facilitation is the engagement; compute is estimated, then billed on actuals.
Operational Friction & Multipolar Mandate
Why traditional ad-hoc approaches fail at scale, and the precision protocol deployed to resolve it.
Why this engagement exists
Strategy is rehearsed in workshops, not simulations. When the environment moves — a competitor, a regime change, a supply shock — the organization improvises, because the decision was never tested against branching futures before it had to be made.
- ✕Major decisions are made from best-case assumptions that nobody has tested.
- ✕Scenario planning is a whiteboard exercise with no branching and no consequences.
- ✕When the environment moves, leadership convenes a crisis meeting instead of running a rehearsed response.
- ✕The organization has no shared picture of what happens under each plausible future.
Engineered scope & execution
We configure WINS on your actual decision nodes — market, alliance, capital, industrial policy — and run the futures with your people in the room. Facilitation and after-action are the engagement. Compute is estimated once the scenario is configured, then billed on actuals. You leave with decision paths and playbooks, not a workshop summary.
- ✓Decision framing: the actual choice and its consequences
- ✓WINS scenario configuration on your decision nodes
- ✓Facilitated game sessions with your senior players
- ✓After-action analysis with consequence mapping
- ✓Decision paths and playbooks for each tested future
What You Take Away
Every deliverable is named, structured, and tied to an immutable operational outcome. Nothing ships as a slide deck with no longevity.
Configured WINS scenarios on your decision nodes
The decision framed and configured in WINS with the scenario families that matter to it.
The game tests your actual decision, not a generic scenario.
Simulation results and consequence map
What happens under each branch: second- and third-order consequences mapped per option.
Leadership sees the downstream of each choice before committing.
Decision paths and playbooks
Proactive and reactive paths per tested future, written as executable sequences.
When the environment moves, the response is rehearsed, not improvised.
Shared operating picture
One frame across leadership: the decision, the futures, the agreed responses.
Future strategy conversations run from the same map.
How This Engagement Runs
Structured gates from initial telemetry and baseline ingestion to verified exit capabilities.
Frame the decision
The actual choice under analysis is framed with consequences attached. What counts as an answer is agreed before configuration.
Configure the game
WINS is configured on the decision nodes. Compute is estimated at this point — you approve it before games run.
Run the futures
Facilitated sessions with your senior players. The quality of the game tracks the quality of the players in the room.
Close with playbooks
After-action analysis turns results into decision paths and playbooks, with guidance for continued WINS use.
Interactive Pricing Studio & Scope Engine
Our pricing is engineered, not asserted. Configure your organization profile and estate parameters to see the exact real-time cost breakdown.
Configure Your Parameters
The fee moves on three objective multipliers—Sensitivity, Involvement, and Org Type. Each factor reflects real operational handling and operator time.
Sensitivity
×0.90 – ×1.30 on the engagement feeSensitivity sets the handling envelope around the whole engagement: how data moves, where evidence lives, who can touch it, and what containment we must maintain. Higher sensitivity means cleared handling, segregated evidence, and slower, more deliberate operations — real cost that a flat fee would hide.
Involvement
×0.85 – ×1.35 on the engagement feeInvolvement is how much Multipolar operator time is on the hook. Counsel at checkpoints is a different commitment than embedded delivery inside your team, your systems, and your cadence. The multiplier tracks senior hours actually committed — not a markup.
Organization type
×0.85 – ×1.25 on the engagement feeThe same technical work lands differently depending on who is buying it. Federal and defense engagements carry procurement, compliance, security review, and stakeholder alignment that a mid-market engagement does not. The multiplier prices the coordination and accountability surface, not the analysis.
Frequently Asked Questions
Specific intelligence regarding security clearance, deliverable ownership, platform telemetry, and execution cadence.
You do. Facilitation and after-action are the engagement. Compute is estimated once the scenario is configured, then billed on actuals — you approve the estimate before games run.
Have unique mission constraints?
Our engineering leadership reviews technical architectures and custom scoping directly under NDA.
Ask an Operator →Adjacent & Next-Stage Engagements
Expand into ongoing retainer coverage, organizational digital twins, or hardware trust specifications.
Ready to Brief Us on the Wargaming & Scenario Simulation?
We select our client engagements carefully and confirm technical scope, operator capacity, and final pricing directly in the initial briefing.