AI Policy Underwriting Support
CYBAIR-powered underwriting support. Each policyholder AI workload is a CYBAIR unit; the engagement turns scores into an underwriting framework.
Operational Friction & Multipolar Mandate
Why traditional ad-hoc approaches fail at scale, and the precision protocol deployed to resolve it.
Why this engagement exists
Insurers and assurance functions are being asked to underwrite AI risk without workload-level posture or an evidence trail they can defend. Underwriting relies on questionnaires and self-attestation — exactly the inputs that fail when a claim or audit tests them.
- ✕AI risk is underwritten from questionnaires with no workload-level evidence.
- ✕Underwriters cannot distinguish a well-run AI estate from a dangerous one.
- ✕Claims or disputes expose that the risk was never actually measured.
- ✕The book grows while the assurance method stays at self-attestation.
Engineered scope & execution
Each policyholder AI workload in scope is a CYBAIR unit — same engine, same $5,000 unit, compliance and evidence included. The engagement turns those scores into an underwriting risk framework, an evidence strategy, and a readiness picture underwriters can use. How unit costs are recovered in premium or fees is your commercial motion; we do not hide the units.
- ✓Book definition: which policyholders and AI workloads sit in the first cut
- ✓CYBAIR posture scoring per policyholder workload
- ✓Underwriting risk framework built on the scores
- ✓Evidence and attestation strategy for the book
- ✓A repeatable motion as the book grows
What You Take Away
Every deliverable is named, structured, and tied to an immutable operational outcome. Nothing ships as a slide deck with no longevity.
AI policyholder posture scoring
CYBAIR posture per policyholder AI workload — the same engine and evidence standard as first-party assessments.
Underwriting decisions rest on measured posture, not self-attestation.
Underwriting risk framework
How CYBAIR scores translate into underwriting decisions: tiers, thresholds, and pricing logic.
The book is underwritten with a defensible, repeatable method.
Evidence and attestation strategy
The evidence standard for the book and how attestation is produced and verified.
Claims, disputes, and audits are answered from prepared evidence.
Policyholder readiness assessment
Which policyholders are ready for AI coverage terms and which need remediation first.
Coverage terms are matched to actual readiness, reducing adverse selection.
How This Engagement Runs
Structured gates from initial telemetry and baseline ingestion to verified exit capabilities.
Define the book
Which policyholders and which AI workloads sit in the first cut. The workload count sets the CYBAIR units.
Score on CYBAIR
Same engine, same $5,000 unit, compliance and evidence included. Policyholder workloads are profiled and scored.
Write the framework
How scores become underwriting decisions: tiers, thresholds, and pricing logic designed with your underwriters.
Leave a repeatable path
The motion is documented so it scales as the book grows — and can become a retainer as volume increases.
Interactive Pricing Studio & Scope Engine
Our pricing is engineered, not asserted. Configure your organization profile and estate parameters to see the exact real-time cost breakdown.
Configure Your Parameters
The fee moves on three objective multipliers—Sensitivity, Involvement, and Org Type. Each factor reflects real operational handling and operator time.
Sensitivity
×0.90 – ×1.30 on the engagement feeSensitivity sets the handling envelope around the whole engagement: how data moves, where evidence lives, who can touch it, and what containment we must maintain. Higher sensitivity means cleared handling, segregated evidence, and slower, more deliberate operations — real cost that a flat fee would hide.
Involvement
×0.85 – ×1.35 on the engagement feeInvolvement is how much Multipolar operator time is on the hook. Counsel at checkpoints is a different commitment than embedded delivery inside your team, your systems, and your cadence. The multiplier tracks senior hours actually committed — not a markup.
Organization type
×0.85 – ×1.25 on the engagement feeThe same technical work lands differently depending on who is buying it. Federal and defense engagements carry procurement, compliance, security review, and stakeholder alignment that a mid-market engagement does not. The multiplier prices the coordination and accountability surface, not the analysis.
Frequently Asked Questions
Specific intelligence regarding security clearance, deliverable ownership, platform telemetry, and execution cadence.
Insurers, auditors, and assurance functions that must underwrite or attest to AI risk. The framework adapts to assurance as well as underwriting.
Have unique mission constraints?
Our engineering leadership reviews technical architectures and custom scoping directly under NDA.
Ask an Operator →Adjacent & Next-Stage Engagements
Expand into ongoing retainer coverage, organizational digital twins, or hardware trust specifications.
Ready to Brief Us on the AI Policy Underwriting Support?
We select our client engagements carefully and confirm technical scope, operator capacity, and final pricing directly in the initial briefing.